Testimonial

Empowering researchers, faculty, and librarians with practical and insightful resources.

Keep up to date with the latest resources

1

Organizations, Researchers

Protocol Development for Scoping Reviews

Build a Strong Foundation for Your Scoping Review

Organizations, Researchers

Understanding Review Types in Research

Start your research on the right track with this clear guide to choosing the right review type.

Organizations, Researchers

Covidence eBook Bundle

Step-by-Step Guidance for Systematic Review Success

Organizations

University of Birmingham

Read how University of Birmingham is fuelling pioneering academic research with Covidence.

Organizations, Researchers

Screening for Systematic Reviews

This guide provides a thorough resource for designing and implementing screening processes in systematic reviews.

Researchers

Webinar Wrap-Up: Essentials of Writing a Protocol for a Systematic Review

In this wrap-up document, we address the most insightful questions raised during the webinar, Essentials of Writing a Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Organizations, Researchers

Protocol Development for Systematic Reviews

This guide offers a comprehensive resource for crafting systematic review protocols.

Organizations, Researchers

“Streamline data extraction with Covidence”

This conference poster highlights key updates to Covidence’s Extraction 1 tool, including a new PICO(T) template and flexible study extraction forms designed to streamline and optimize the systematic review process.

Organizations, Researchers

“Untapped potential for systematic review software & automation…”

This poster highlights the rapid rise in systematic reviews and the underutilization of automation tools that could significantly reduce the time and resources needed for efficient evidence screening.

Researchers

Understanding the Review Types

In this guide, we introduce the Systematic Review Family. Discover the differences among various review types, including Rapid Reviews, Scoping Reviews, Literature Reviews, Living Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Evidence Gap Maps.